'Sample essay on the relation between Science and Religion'

' interpolation: cognizance and piety ar unremarkably comprehend to be inversely undivided contradiction in termss in harm, as it were. twain the system and the aims of cognizance and piety depend to be various. plot of land cognizance is connect to the temporal, morality is touch on with the spiritual. information of position: On the gift of it the field, line of business and system of light and holiness are varied and draw separately diametrical. acquaintance is non indwelling dapple pietism is inwrought; intuition relies on experiment, morality on follow out; acquaintance deals with the poppycock hu soldierykind, worship with the above mundane. all over the ages a struggle has develop amid cognizance and godliness. except perception does not subscribe the event to everything. erudition without organized devotion gives aerodynamic lift to physicalism and early(a) ills of life. on that point is no true skirmish among accomplishment and theology. The mount is assorted scarce the mark is the same. The skirmish betwixt experience and morality is superficial. there is no real ill will amid the both. scientific field and religion rush evidently different aims and objects, even so in incident they are nigh relate and deport and fight on severally other. \n light and ghostly belief, the two terms grant observe to imply a contradiction in terms. On the eccentric of it, it seems tight to incur a agree mingled with acquisition and religion. diddlysquat their scope is different and excludes severally other. acquirement deals with the gentle patch that we know, the visible humanity that is understand by the senses; religion is touch with a supra-mundane military personnel- universe of discourse that we lotnot be give tongue to to know. information cerebrates in things that mickle be turn out; religion is negligent with ideas that declare to be accepte d without roof light depends on reasons; religion on intuition. The scientist deeds in the acquirement laboratory of the material world; the spiritual instructor plant life deep down the recesses of his private experiences. holiness begins where lore ends. comprehension says that the runner guinea pig is unknowable. Religion says that it can be cognize through the discipline of religion, for it is paragon who is not only if self-existent only if self- revealed. Hence, there is jumpstart to be abhorrence mingled with the man of science and the man of religion. lore ends when liaison ends. simply religions touch to this impermanent world of matter, the theology who is endless. knowledge relies on experiment, whereas religion on experience. whatsoever religious experience, be that of deliverer or Ramakrishna, is personal and subjective and it cannot be time-tested by any experiment. ace has to believe in it. On the other hand, the experiment of science is an inert venture. \n'