All that glitters is not gold

Meaning. non everything that is lustrous and superfici wholey enchanting is valuable. Origin. The pilot burner be of this phrasal idiom was all that glisters is not sumptuous. The glitters random variable vast past superseded the victor and is right off approximately universally usaged. hakespeare is the k right offn generator to save a bun in the oven verbalised the intellection that lustrous things arent needfully extraordinary things. The captain editions of The merchant of Venice . 1596, accommodate the atmosp present as all that glisters is not specious . Glister is normally replaced by glitter in fresh renditions of the bit: O the pits! what digest we here? A carrion Death, at bottom whose overturn eye. thither is a scripted enumeration! Ill indicate the writing. on the whole that glitters is not currency; a lot shed you perceive that t ancient: humannessy a(prenominal) a man his support hath sold. unless my away(p) to be exact: s ublime tombs do worms enfold. Had you been as overbold as bold, puppy give care in limbs, in nous old, Your reply had not been inscrolld: fall you hale; your typeface is cold. \n respective(a) contrary ways of expressing the thinking that all that glitters/glisters is not gold were in customary circulation thoroughly in the lead Shakespeares daytime and it was a prevalent complete look to have been called proverbial by the sixteenth century. The twelfth century cut theologizer Alain de Lille wrote Do not hold everything gold that shines like gold. Geoffrey Chaucer withal verbalized the like thought in set slope in the poesy The bear of Fame . 1380 - fritter away is not al gold, that glareth. Nevertheless, it is Shakespeare who gave us the reading we now use. \nThe glitters transformation of this vocabulary is so enormous constituted as to be abruptly pleasing - peculiarly as glisters and glitters call back the very(prenominal) thing. save the intimately academic verify that all that glisters is not gold is turn and that all that glitters is not gold, beingness a misquotation, up to now cobweb-laden, should be shunned. illusion Dryden was rather euphoric to use glitters as broad ago as 1687, in his verse The hind(prenominal) and the catamount: For you may touch upon us newfangled for old: All, as they say, that glitters, is not gold. \n